Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20233313522

542 Limpsfield Road, WARLINGHAM, CR6 9DS

demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 4 terrace houses, including hard and soft landscaping etc

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on protected species, with particular regard to bats and starlings
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to scale, massing design and layout
  • the effect of the proposed car parking provision on highway safety

What decided it

The potential harm to protected species, particularly bats, which the appellant's evidence did not adequately demonstrate would be avoided, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of the proposal including housing delivery.

The potential ecological harm to protected species significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery, effective use of land, and limited economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11, 111, 119, 130, 180, 181

Plan policies cited: Policy CSP17 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008), Policy DP19 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008), Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DP8 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DP5 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy CSP12 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.