Planning appeal decision
Land at Inhurst Cottages, Inhurst Lane, Baughurst, Hampshire, RG26 5JS
Planning appeal 3314252 at Land at Inhurst Cottages, Inhurst Lane, Baughurst, Hampshire, RG26 5JS (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 February 2024 by Inspector Davies N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for the development, bearing in mind the settlement policies of the development plan.
the erection of 14no. dwellings and associated parking
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Davies N
- Postcode
- RG26 5JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is suitable for the development, bearing in mind the settlement policies of the development plan
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including any impact on the trees around the boundary of the site
- The effect of the development on public safety, with particular regard to the off-site nuclear emergency planning arrangements for the Aldermaston Atomic Weapons Establishment (the AWE)
- Whether the proposed mix of dwellings would address the local need for housing
- Whether suitable arrangements are in place to ensure that the development would make appropriate provision for affordable housing, biodiversity, and public open space
What decided it
The substantial harm to character and appearance of the area and the adverse effect on public safety through impact on off-site nuclear emergency planning arrangements significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, even under the tilted balance.
The significant benefits of housing provision (moderate weight) and affordable housing (considerable weight), together with limited economic benefits, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by substantial harm to character and appearance and substantial harm to public safety, when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy SS7Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy CN3Policy CN1Policy CN6Policy EM4Policy EM5Policy CS1Policy SD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 101Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 20266011048Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed20 October 20266011464Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®