Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 July 20233314366

72 Harefield Road, Uxbridge, UB8 1PL

Planning appeal 3314366 at 72 Harefield Road, Uxbridge, UB8 1PL (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 27 July 2023 by Inspector Benson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

demolition of existing dwelling and erection of a building to provide 3 x 1-bed and 6 x 2-bed flats with associated parking and amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Benson E
Postcode
UB8 1PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effects on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in respect of overlooking, outlook and loss of light
  • Whether there would be noise and disturbance resulting from the use of the access to the parking area (Appeal B only)
  • Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory accommodation for future residents (Appeal B only)
  • Whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory mix of housing (Appeal A only)

What decided it

The scale, massing and design of both proposed developments would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area and create unacceptably overbearing effects on neighbouring occupiers, contrary to development plan policies and national guidance requiring high quality design-led development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1Policy DMHB 11Policy DM HB12Policy D3Policy D4Policy DMH2Policy H10Policy D6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

282 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011516
    73 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266008246
    21 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.