Planning appeal decision
Land Adj to the Stables, Sutton Hill, Sutton Mandeville, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP3 5ND
Planning appeal 3314731 at Land Adj to the Stables, Sutton Hill, Sutton Mandeville, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP3 5ND (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 1 September 2023 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would represent a suitable location for housing.
construction of a four bedroom detached dwelling and car barn with associated vehicular access
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Savage K
- Postcode
- SP3 5ND
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would represent a suitable location for housing
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the landscape and scenic beauty of the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- the effect on highway safety
- the effect on archaeological remains in the area
- the effect on protected species and other wildlife
- the effect on the integrity of designated nature conservation sites, with respect to nutrient levels
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple grounds including settlement strategy, AONB protection, highway safety, archaeology and protected species, and the Framework's tilted balance does not apply due to the presence of AONB and SAC designations which provide clear reasons for refusal.
Although the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply because AONB and SAC designations provide clear reasons for refusal; the limited benefits of a single dwelling and modest economic activity do not outweigh the significant conflicts with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1Core Policy 2Core Policy 27Core Policy 50Core Policy 51Core Policy 57Core Policy 58Core Policy 60Core Policy 61Core Policy 69
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 99Paragraph 194
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wiltshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed26 October 20266008440Saxon, Castle Road, Devizes, SN10 1HL
- Allowed30 September 20266007924Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
- Dismissed13 July 20266003469North Farm, West Overton, Marlborough, SN8 1QE
- Dismissed4 June 20266004352Land Adjacent to High Post Business Park, High Post, Salisbury, SP4 6AT
- Allowed7 May 20266000703Land South of Spine Road East, Ashton Keynes, GL7 5TL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®