Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld28 November 20243315343

77 Woodbourne Avenue, LONDON, SW16 1UX

Without planning permission, the erection of a full width/height dormer roof extension onto the rear roof slope of the premises (‘the unauthorised rear roof extension’)

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the unauthorised rear roof extension falls within the parameters of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) and therefore requires planning permission

What decided it

The unauthorised roof extension does not comply with the mandatory requirements of Class B, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the GPDO, particularly the requirement to maintain or reinstate eaves and achieve a 0.2m separation, and therefore falls outside permitted development and requires planning permission.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.