Planning appeal decision
Lantern Cottage Spring Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, RH16 2RF
Planning appeal 3315459 at Lantern Cottage Spring Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, RH16 2RF (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 20 September 2023 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan.
detached 4 bedroom dwelling with access drive, off street parking and turning area, with rear terrace, the ground floor will have an entrance hall, ambulant disabled WC, lounge, study, utility and family kitchen diner, with a principle bedroom with en-suite, the second double bedroom with en-suite and two further double bedrooms and family bath room with galleried landing
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
- Postcode
- RH16 2RF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, in particular the Lindfield Conservation Area
- whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the development is safe across its lifetime and would not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan as it is located in the countryside outside the built-up area boundary without demonstrated identified local housing need, and would cause harmful effects on the character and appearance of the area and Lindfield Conservation Area to which great weight must be given.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP4DP6DP12DP15DP26DP35DP41Policy 1Policy 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed10 September 20266011079Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
- Notice varied and upheld6 July 20263376721Land Fir Trees Place, Turners Hill Road, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HQ
- Dismissed30 April 20266002774Rocklands, Church Lane, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6UP
- Allowed16 September 20253363187Land Adjacent to Hilgay Cottage , Birchwood Grove, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
- Allowed20 August 20253366246Firs Farm, Copthorne Common, Copthorne, West Sussex, RH10 3LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®