Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 January 20243316399

59A Hainault Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 1EA

Planning appeal 3316399 at 59A Hainault Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 1EA (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 11 January 2024 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the availability of on-street parking.

described on the planning application form as: “Existing use is E(a) shop at ground level and one C3(a) flat on levels one and two. Proposal is a loft conversion, ground floor rear extension and conversion of the ground floor extension, levels one and two and the loft conversion to a large 7 room HMO with external amenity space to rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
E11 1EA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the availability of on-street parking
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties at Nos 57 and 61 Hainault Road in terms of light and outlook
  • Whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers of the host property in terms of light and outlook

What decided it

The proposal would increase on-street parking pressure to the detriment of highway safety due to the lack of an enforceable mechanism to secure car-free development, conflicting with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM16Policy CS7Policy CS15Policy CS13Policy DM4Policy DM23Policy DM29Policy DM32Policy CS2Policy DM6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

541 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  3. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS
  4. Allowed16 July 20266007500
    38 Second Avenue, Walthamstow, London, E17 9QH
  5. Dismissed22 May 20266003136
    52 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.