Planning appeal decision
Automotive House, Grays Place, Slough, SL2 5AF
Planning appeal 3316507 at Automotive House, Grays Place, Slough, SL2 5AF (Slough Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 July 2023 by Inspector Mulloy C, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of existing building and construction of 51 residential apartments, laying out of landscaping, car and cycle parking and ancillary development
- Authority
- Slough Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Mulloy C
- Postcode
- SL2 5AF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing occupiers at Intercity House with specific reference to outlook
- Whether the proposal accords with Policy SKL 3 of the Slough Local Development Framework Site Allocations DPD which requires the Stoke Road and Mill Street site allocation to be comprehensively planned
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety with specific reference to the vehicular and pedestrian access
- Whether the proposal would provide a safe and accessible environment for existing and future occupiers
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing with particular reference to whether there is a need for a late-stage viability review
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions (outlook) of occupiers of Intercity House significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing, economic and sustainability benefits.
The significant harm to character/appearance and to neighbours' outlook, weighed against substantial/significant benefits including housing land supply contribution, economic benefits, sustainable location and reduced car use, tipped against the proposal even under the tilted balance in paragraph 11(d).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1Core Policy 3Core Policy 4Core Policy 7Core Policy 8Core Policy 9Core Policy 10Core Policy 12Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy EMP6Policy SKL3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 92Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 132Paragraph 134
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Slough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed27 October 2026601408472 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
- Dismissed8 October 2026601186647, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
- Notice upheld28 September 2026337397662 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
- Notice varied and upheld25 September 20263369048Land at 33 Hillside, Slough, SL1 2RW
- Allowed25 September 202660107309, Yew Tree Road, Slough, SL1 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®