Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 March 20243316609

Land to the rear of 23 & 25 Station Road, Digswell, Welwyn, AL6 0DU

the demolition of two vacant commercial units and erection of two apartments, incorporating a retail unit at ground floor level, and four semi-detached dwellings with residential/private parking, cycle store, refuse store, private and communal amenities

Authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lo S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed parking arrangement on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers and future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and amenity space

What decided it

The total omission of parking provision for existing dwellings would cause displacement of parking to visitor and retail spaces and surrounding streets, resulting in an unacceptable impact on highway safety that outweighs the housing benefits.

The benefits of housing delivery and windfall site development were outweighed by the unacceptable impact on highway safety caused by inadequate parking provision, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the NPPF taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 70, 9, 12, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy SADM2, Policy SADM12, Policy SP9, Policy SADM 11

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.