Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite Leedanton Farm, Cumming Road, Downham, Billericay, CM11 1LW
Planning appeal 3316812 at Land Opposite Leedanton Farm, Cumming Road, Downham, Billericay, CM11 1LW (Chelmsford Borough Council) was allowed on 2 February 2024 by Inspector Board D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy (A & B).
Appeal A: outline planning permission for a bungalow and detached garage for residential use with access; Appeal B: use of land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes, together with formation of hardstanding and day room ancillary to that use
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Board D
- Postcode
- CM11 1LW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy (A & B)
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt (A & B)
- whether the site would be an appropriate location for residential development (A & B)
- the effect of the scheme on designated European conservation sites (A)
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development within the Green Belt (A & B)
What decided it
For Appeal A, the finding that the proposal was limited infill causing no Green Belt harm was decisive; for Appeal B, the personal circumstances of the family, the best interests of the children, and the absence of alternative sites were found to clearly outweigh the Green Belt harm, establishing very special circumstances.
For Appeal B, the substantial weight attributed to the Green Belt harm from inappropriate development was clearly outweighed by the personal need, the best interests of the children, the absence of alternative sites, and equality considerations, establishing very special circumstances; Appeal A required no such balance as it was found not to be inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S11Policy DM6Policy DM9Policy S1Policy S7Policy DM16Policy DM3Policy GT1Policy DM25
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
- Dismissed28 July 20266007350Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
- Dismissed18 May 20266006009Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
- Allowed1 May 20266005305Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
- Allowed1 May 20266005303Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®