Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 September 20233316910

Hooton Hotel, Hooton Road, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH66 7NL

Planning appeal 3316910 at Hooton Hotel, Hooton Road, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH66 7NL (Cheshire West and Chester) was allowed on 25 September 2023 by Inspector Savage K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies, the provisions of the Framework, the effect on the openness of the Green belt and the purposes of including land within it;.

Redevelopment of site for new residential development involving the demolition of the existing public house and erection of 9 no open market dwellings and 4 no affordable dwellings with associated new single point of vehicular access, landscaping treatment and biodiversity net gain

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
CH66 7NL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies, the provisions of the Framework, the effect on the openness of the Green belt and the purposes of including land within it;
  • Whether the proposal would represent an appropriate location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of the site to local services and facilities and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area;
  • The effect of the proposal on protected species;
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it.

What decided it

The finding that the proposal fell within the paragraph 149(g)(ii) Green Belt exception (re-use of PDL causing no more than moderate, not substantial, harm to openness while meeting an identified affordable housing need), so it was not inappropriate development and no other harms outweighed the scheme's benefits.

the proposal was found to accord with the development plan and the Framework taken as a whole, with benefits including boosting housing supply, affordable housing provision, efficient use of previously developed land, biodiversity net gain and economic activity, and no identified material harms, so the balance favoured allowing the appeal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SOC1Policy STRAT9Policy DM19Policy STRAT 1Policy STRAT 2Policy STRAT 8Policy ENV4Policy DM44Policy DM39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266008480
    Moorsbarrow Hall Farm, Brereton Lane, Sproston, CW10 0JX
  2. Allowed22 October 20266009366
    Land Adjacent Mangoletsi Ltd, London Road, Allostock, Northwich, WA16 9NS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266013998
    Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266012737
    Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266011029
    Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.