Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 April 20233317007

34 Lakeside Road, London, W14 0DN

the erection of a rear extension at second floor level on top of the existing back addition; installation of 2no rooflights in the front roof slope, 1no rooflight above the main flat roof at roof level and 1no rooflight above the roof of second floor rear back addition; installation of 1no window in the rear roof slope

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building
  • Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lakeside/Sinclair/Blythe Road Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would be at odds with the prevailing pattern of pitched roofs on the rear outriggers and would constitute an incongruous element in the Conservation Area context, with no public benefits to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the heritage asset.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Key Principles CAG2, Key Principles CAG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.