Planning appeal decision
Former St Mary’S Vicarage, Station Road, Henbury, Bristol, BS10 7QQ
Planning appeal 3317231 at Former St Mary’S Vicarage, Station Road, Henbury, Bristol, BS10 7QQ (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 1 November 2023 by Inspector Sutton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the Henbury Conservation Area and the setting of the neighbouring listed building.
Demolition of existing buildings and provision of 14 no. 4 bedroom residential dwellings (Class C3), together with car parking, a new vehicular access, communal amenity, landscaping, installation of plant and other associated works
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Sutton A
- Postcode
- BS10 7QQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the Henbury Conservation Area and the setting of the neighbouring listed building
- Whether the proposal would make satisfactory provision for affordable housing, having regard for relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on on-site ecology
- Whether the proposal would make suitable provision for waste management
- Whether any harm would be outweighed by public benefits, or a decision contrary to the development plan is justified by other material considerations
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Henbury Conservation Area and the adverse effect on the setting of the neighbouring listed building, which in the absence of clear and convincing justification was not outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery.
The substantial public benefits of providing 14 much-needed family homes (with the Council able to demonstrate only 2.45 years of housing land supply) and significant social and economic benefits were substantially outweighed by the less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and the harm to the setting of the listed building, which lacked clear and convincing justification.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM19Policy DM3Policy BCS17Policy DM32Policy BCS22Policy DM31Policy BCS18Policy BCS9Policy BCS21Policy DM15Policy DM17Policy DM26Policy DM27
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed27 October 20266010371128 Church Road, Bristol, BS5 9HH
- Allowed22 October 20266011341172 Filton Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS7 0AX
- Dismissed19 October 2026601047046 Berkeley Road, Speedwell, Bristol, BS16 3NB
- Dismissed12 October 20266015419Gloucester Road Service Station, 410 - 424 Gloucester Road, Horfield, Bristol, BS7 8TX
- Dismissed12 October 202660153491 Kennard Road, St George, BS15 8AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®