Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 October 20233317439

Rear Of 92, 94 And 112, Ferrymead Avenue, Greenford, Middlesex, , London, UB6 9TN

Planning appeal 3317439 at Rear Of 92, 94 And 112, Ferrymead Avenue, Greenford, Middlesex, , London, UB6 9TN (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 25 October 2023 by Inspector Worley E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

Provision of 4no. single family dwellings with private garden amenity spaces, parking spaces and communal refuse & cycle storage area in the rear gardens of nos.92, 94 & 112 Ferrymead Avenue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Worley E
Postcode
UB6 9TN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 94 and 92 Ferrymead Avenue with specific regard to noise and disturbance, and the occupiers of 114 Ferrymead Avenue with regards to loss of light and overshadowing of the rear garden
  • highway safety and the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 94 and 92, having regard to the location of waste facilities
  • the existing trees in the rear garden of 90 Ferrymead Avenue

What decided it

The proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the area by introducing a dominant and anomalous built form of considerable scale and bulk into an otherwise open backland area, conflicting with the established linear pattern of development and spacious rear gardens.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document adopted 2013Policy 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document adopted 2013Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI7 of the London Plan 2021Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021Policy 1.1 of the Core Strategy 2012

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

224 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Dismissed28 July 20263375731
    153-155 Uxbridge Road, London, W7 3SP
  4. Notice upheld24 July 20263351648
    55 Evelyn Grove, Southall, UB1 2BP
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266007913
    Unit 2, The Three Horseshoes, South Road, Southall, UB1 1SU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.