Planning appeal decision
Peaberry Court, 87 Greyhound Hill, London, NW4 4JE
Planning appeal 3317453 at Peaberry Court, 87 Greyhound Hill, London, NW4 4JE (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 22 August 2023 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site provides a suitable location for the development proposed having particular regard to the development plan's policies relating to tall buildings and the effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.
internal alterations to 10no. existing flats; upwards extension of an additional two floors and front, side and rear extensions at third, fourth, fifth floor and roof levels to create 40no. additional self-contained flats. Ground to roof front extension to main entrance for the provision of a lift. Provision of plant equipment on the roof. Replacement of existing brick and render facade with new brick and render facade. Provision of balconies, private and communal amenity areas and associated cycle storage and refuse. Reallocation of existing car parking spaces in the basement. Landscaping to be a reserved matter
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones H
- Postcode
- NW4 4JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site provides a suitable location for the development proposed having particular regard to the development plan's policies relating to tall buildings and the effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The 8-storey building would be a tall building isolated from other tall buildings and set amongst much lower buildings, appearing incongruous and out of keeping with its surroundings in a location not identified as suitable for tall buildings, causing harm that outweighs the benefits of housing delivery and other considerations.
The benefits of housing delivery, potential affordable housing contribution, carbon reduction measures and improved accessibility were substantially and demonstrably outweighed by the considerable adverse effects on character and appearance and conflict with tall buildings policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D9 of the London Plan, March 2021Policy D3 of the London PlanPolicy CS5 of Barnet's Local Plan Core Strategy Development Plan Document, September 2012Policy DM05 of Barnet's Local Plan Development Management Policies Development Plan Document, September 2012Policy DM01 of Barnet's Local Plan Development Management Policies Development Plan Document, September 2012Policy H1 of the London PlanPolicy SI2 of the London PlanPolicy D1 of the London PlanPolicy CS NPPF of the Core Strategy
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 69
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Barnet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld29 September 2026335964435 Hillview Gardens, London, NW4 2JJ
- Allowed10 September 2026600040541 Brent Park Road, London, NW4 3HN
- Notice upheld28 August 2026336160153 Essex Park, London, N3 1ND
- Notice varied and upheld27 August 2026336134827 Dale Grove, London, N12 8EE
- Notice upheld26 August 2026337608848 Oldberry Road, Edgware, HA8 9DB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®