Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 June 20233317639

96 Iffley Road, London, W6 0PF

Planning appeal 3317639 at 96 Iffley Road, London, W6 0PF (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was allowed on 6 June 2023 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the parent building, terrace row as well as the Bradmore Conservation Area.

erection of rear roof extension raising the roof ridge by 300mm; Installation of 3no roof lights to front roof slope; Installation of obscure glazed screens and metal balustrade around part of the flat roof of the existing back addition at 3rd floor in connection with the formation of a roof terrace

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E
Postcode
W6 0PF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the parent building, terrace row as well as the Bradmore Conservation Area

What decided it

The existence of an extant planning permission for substantially similar works, combined with the varied character of roof extensions already present in the conservation area, meant that the enlarged dormer would not cause undue harm to the character and appearance of the heritage asset.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy HC1Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC1Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC4Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 791 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.