Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 June 20233317639

96 Iffley Road, LONDON, W6 0PF

erection of rear roof extension raising the roof ridge by 300mm; Installation of 3no roof lights to front roof slope; Installation of obscure glazed screens and metal balustrade around part of the flat roof of the existing back addition at 3rd floor in connection with the formation of a roof terrace

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the parent building, terrace row as well as the Bradmore Conservation Area

What decided it

The existence of an extant planning permission for substantially similar works, combined with the varied character of roof extensions already present in the conservation area, meant that the enlarged dormer would not cause undue harm to the character and appearance of the heritage asset.

Framework references: 199

Plan policies cited: London Plan 2021 Policy HC1, Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC1, Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC4, Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan 2018 Policy DC8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.