Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 May 20233317661

52A Spring Road, Ettingshall, WOLVERHAMPTON, West Midlands, WV4 6LQ

a double storey side extension, first floor rear extension and new front and rear facing roof lights to support habitable loft conversion

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Gunn J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the scale and design of the proposal, which would conflict with development plan policies seeking high-quality design respecting local character, outweighed the acceptable highway safety position.

Plan policies cited: Policy CSP4, Policy ENV3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy D7, Policy D8, Policy D9, Policy AM12, Policy AM15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.