Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 July 20233317885

234 Stockton Road, Hartlepool, TS25 5DE

Planning appeal 3317885 at 234 Stockton Road, Hartlepool, TS25 5DE (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was allowed on 21 July 2023 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect that removing the condition and the 24-hour operation of the development would have on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to noise.

demolition of existing kiosk building and forecourt canopy and erection of a roadside service facility, including petrol filling station (sui generis) with ancillary retail shop, associated access, car parking and landscaping arrangements without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref H/2021/0573, dated 3 August 2022

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Harrison F
Postcode
TS25 5DE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that removing the condition and the 24-hour operation of the development would have on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to noise

What decided it

The noise impact assessment, undertaken in accordance with relevant standards and demonstrating that activity noise would not be distinctly noticeable given the existing noise climate, combined with the imposition of conditions requiring acoustic fencing and restricted delivery hours, satisfied the Inspector that 24-hour operation would not cause unacceptable adverse effects on neighbouring residents' living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QP4Policy QP6Policy RC17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 185

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hartlepool

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed17 September 20266008410
    14 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
  2. Allowed7 May 20253358229
    117 York Road, Hartlepool, TS26 9DL
  3. Dismissed29 August 20243343622
    91 Elwick Road, Hartlepool, TS26 9AU
  4. Allowed13 March 20233309272
    The Old Yacht Club, Ferry Road, Hartlepool, Durham, TS24 0AE
  5. Allowed28 August 20266011212
    58 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.