Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 October 20233318461

75-77 Jeddo Road, London, W12 9ED

the demolition of existing three storey building; erection of replacement three storey high building to provide replacement accommodation in flexible form of 487 sq.m of Class B1(a) or B1(c) floorspace and a 27 sq.m retail unit (Class A1) at ground floor level, and 8 no. residential units (2 x 1 bed, 5 x 2 bed, 1 x 3 bed) at first floor level and above; with associated external rear terrace areas and provision of on-site cycle storage without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 2018/03682/FUL, dated 28 February 2019

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Pearce S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not conditions 30, 31 and 32 are reasonable, necessary and relevant to planning, having regard to on-street car parking provision in the area and the impact on air quality

What decided it

Conditions 31 and 32 fail the test of reasonableness because planning conditions run with the land or building, not with individuals, and it is not the role of the planning system to control the actions of future occupiers in applying for parking permits.

Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy T4, Policy CC10, Policy HO2, Policy HO11, Key Principle TR3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.