Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 October 20233318470

Land south of Holt Cottages, Ashford Hill, Hampshire, RG19 8BH

outline planning application for the erection of 36 dwellings, including affordable housing, with associated public open space and landscaping, together with means of access from the B3051

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Chamberlain G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to the spatial strategy in the development plan and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposed development on the landscape
  • Whether any adverse impacts of the proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh its benefits

What decided it

The combined adverse impacts of conflict with the spatial strategy, poor accessibility to services and sustainable transport, and moderate landscape harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the scheme's benefits under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

the adverse impacts of conflict with the spatial strategy, poor accessibility to services/facilities and moderate landscape harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain

Framework references: 11, 14, 60, 62, 69, 74, 79, 81, 105, 152, 174, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CN1, Policy CN6, Policy EM4, Policy EM5, Policy SS1, Policy SS2, Policy SS3, Policy SS4, Policy SS5, Policy SS6, Policy HD1, Policy L1, Policy CN9, Policy SD1, Policy EM1, Policy EM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.