Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 January 20243318481

1 Motley Avenue, London, EC2A 4SU

Planning appeal 3318481 at 1 Motley Avenue, London, EC2A 4SU (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 17 January 2024 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the loss of the office use.

the change of use of the ground floor office and upper floor maisonette to form a single-family dwelling with alterations to the rear of the ground floor to form amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
EC2A 4SU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the loss of the office use
  • whether future occupiers of the proposed dwelling would have satisfactory living conditions with particular regard to the proposed outdoor space, the amount of light available and the outlook from ground floor habitable rooms
  • whether the developer contributions relating to affordable housing, car-free development, carbon offsetting, and the monitoring and management of the obligations are reasonable and necessary to make the development acceptable

What decided it

The defectively drafted car-free development obligation that could not be properly enforced, combined with the unresolved conflict with policies requiring new development to be car-free in this well-connected area, could not be outweighed by the benefits of the proposed development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP27Policy FS01Policy LP26Policy SD4Policy SD5Policy E1Policy D6Policy LP2Policy LP17Policy LP13Policy H4Policy T6Policy LP45Policy LP55Policy SI 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 9Paragraph 8Paragraph 124Paragraph 126Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 801 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  2. Allowed11 August 20266010297
    Flat A 141 Amhurst Road, London, E8 2AW
  3. Dismissed7 July 20266004208
    El Manti, 10 - 12 Andre Street,, Hackney, London,, E8 2AA
  4. Allowed8 June 20266009364
    19 St Andrews Grove, London, N16 5NF
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266004031
    9 Clifden Road, Hackney, London,, E5 0LL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.