Planning appeal decision
Highways Land, Bell Lane, Tile Cross, Birmingham, B33 0HS
Planning appeal 3318683 at Highways Land, Bell Lane, Tile Cross, Birmingham, B33 0HS (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 7 November 2023 by Inspector Pearce S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.
the installation of 15m high slim-line monopole, supporting 6 no. antennas, 1 no. wraparound equipment cabinet at the base of the monopole, 2 no. equipment cabinets, 1 no. AC/Transmission cabinet, 1 no. GPS module and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Pearce S
- Postcode
- B33 0HS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of existing occupiers of nearby properties, with particular regard to outlook
- if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in the location proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed installation would have a significantly harmful effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, and given that suitable alternatives had not been properly explored, this harm was not outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy DM16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 117
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed23 March 20263376018Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 8HW
- Dismissed23 March 20263375839Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham
- Dismissed23 March 20263375725Footpath Outside 86C Old Snow Hill, Birmingham, B4 6HW
- Dismissed28 August 20253365270Stratford Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 9EF
- Allowed22 August 20253366060Jamia Masjid Haroonia, 766 Alum Rock Road, Birmingham, B8 3PX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®