Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld6 December 20243318769

Land Adjacent Beverley Court, Ruislip Road, Notholt, Middlesex, UB5 6XJ

Planning appeal 3318769 at Land Adjacent Beverley Court, Ruislip Road, Notholt, Middlesex, UB5 6XJ (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 6 December 2024 by Inspector Hawkins S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the use for vehicle storage on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

without planning permission, the material change of use of land for car storage, and the erection of a boundary fence and laying of a hard surface which facilitate[s] the material change of use

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Hawkins S
Postcode
UB5 6XJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the use for vehicle storage on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect on highway safety
  • The effect on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers of neighbouring residential property, having regard to outlook and noise and disturbance
  • The effect on biodiversity

What decided it

The use causes unacceptable harm to character and appearance, highway safety, living conditions of neighbours, and biodiversity, in conflict with the Development Plan with no material considerations to outweigh these harms.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DPD Policy 7.4DPD local variation to Policy 2.18Policy 1.1 of the Ealing Development Strategy (CS)London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy T4DPD Policy 7BLondon Plan Policy G6London Plan Policy 5.3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

172 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Quashed On Legal Grounds3 September 20263378189
    25 Scorton Avenue, Perivale, UB6 8LA
  4. Notice upheld26 August 20263376041
    Tiramisu Cafe, 12 St. Marys Road, London, W5 5ES
  5. Notice upheld26 August 20263358322
    95 Greatdown Road, London, W7 1JR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.