Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 June 20243318974

Land North Of A4095, North Leigh , Oxfordshire , OX29 6SL

Planning appeal 3318974 at Land North Of A4095, North Leigh , Oxfordshire , OX29 6SL (West Oxfordshire District Council) was allowed on 26 June 2024 by Inspector Blackwell J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether a material change of the appeal site has occurred and if so, whether that use had subsisted continuously for a period of 10 years prior to the date of application.

the erection of a single storey dwelling with attached kennel, office and kitchen building along with construction of a kennel block all to be used in association with the existing dog training facility

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Blackwell J
Postcode
OX29 6SL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether a material change of the appeal site has occurred and if so, whether that use had subsisted continuously for a period of 10 years prior to the date of application
  • Appeal B: whether the location of the development would be acceptable, with particular regard to business need
  • Appeal B: the effect of the development on the adjacent Public Right of Way
  • Appeal B: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The appellant's demonstrated essential business need to live and operate on site (to meet DEFRA dog breeding licensing standards) combined with the absence of any identified harm to the PROW or to character and appearance.

no harm was identified against any of the main issues (location/business need, PROW, character and appearance), so the policy tests were satisfied and the appeal was allowed without any conflicting harms needing to be weighed against the benefits

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy OS2Policy H2Policy E2Policy WIT6Policy EH4Policy T9
Judgments
Gabbitas v SSE & Newham BC [1985] JPL 630; Sykes v Secretary of State for the Environment [1984] JPL

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

20 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed13 October 20266004776
    Land South of Ramsden, Akeman Street, Ramsden, OX7 3AY
  2. Allowed9 September 20266007705
    Forge Garage, Church Road, Churchill, OX7 6NJ
  3. Dismissed2 September 20266009103
    46 Market Square, Witney, OX28 6AL
  4. Dismissed2 September 20266009101
    46, Market Square, Witney, OX28 6AL
  5. Dismissed5 May 20266002714
    Land at Main Road, Alvescot, West Oxfordshire, OX18 2PU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.