Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 November 20233319023

Site Between 47 & 65 Rosebank Road, Hanwell, London , W7 2EW

the construction of 2no. part three-storey 3 bedroom houses

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 51, 53 and 55 Rosebank Road with particular regard to outlook, privacy, daylight and sunlight
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to standard of accommodation and privacy

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of neighbouring residents would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest housing benefits, making the proposal unsustainable and contrary to the development plan.

The adverse impacts to character and appearance and to neighbouring living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery on a brownfield site, with the conflict with the development plan not outweighed by other considerations including the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 60

Plan policies cited: London Plan 2021 policy D3, London Plan 2021 policy D4, London Plan 2021 policy D6, Ealing Development Management Development Planning Document 2013 policy 7.4, Ealing Development Management Development Planning Document 2013 policy 7B, Ealing Development Management Development Planning Document 2013 policy 7D

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.