Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 November 20233319053

Land Adjacent 29 To 31 Queen Street, Sible Hedingham, Essex, CO9 3RH

the erection of a single, two storey dwelling, landscaping and improvements to the vehicular access

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Catcheside E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site represents a suitable location for housing, having regard to the spatial strategy set out in the development plan and accessibility to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the distinction between the settlement edge and the open countryside

What decided it

The absence of any identified harm to character, appearance, heritage assets or other material considerations, combined with the housing land supply shortfall triggering the tilted balance, meant the modest social and economic benefits of delivering one additional dwelling constituted sustainable development that outweighed the policy conflict.

The conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy was outweighed by the housing land supply shortfall (4.86 years), the site's sustainable location with good access to services, the absence of harm to character, appearance and heritage assets, and the positive contribution to housing supply.

Framework references: 11, 56

Plan policies cited: SP3, LPP1, SP7, LPP42, SP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.