Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20243319659

Trentham Estate, Stone Road , Stoke On Trent , ST4 8JG

Planning appeal 3319659 at Trentham Estate, Stone Road , Stoke On Trent , ST4 8JG (Stafford Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 January 2024 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve the historic features or special architectural interest, including settings, of the Grade II* Registered Park and Garden known as Trentham Gardens, the Grade II* listed Perseus with the Head of Medusa, and the Grade II listed Garden Pavilion; Arbour Trellis; Retaining wall, balustrade, steps and boathouse, and Retaining wall, balustrade and steps between the flower and parterre gardens, and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Trentham Conservation Area.

Full planning permission for the retention of five dining pods, a catering service unit and associated access and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Edginton A
Postcode
ST4 8JG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would preserve the historic features or special architectural interest, including settings, of the Grade II* Registered Park and Garden known as Trentham Gardens, the Grade II* listed Perseus with the Head of Medusa, and the Grade II listed Garden Pavilion; Arbour Trellis; Retaining wall, balustrade, steps and boathouse, and Retaining wall, balustrade and steps between the flower and parterre gardens, and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Trentham Conservation Area
  • Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • If so, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The development would cause substantial harm to the Green Belt through loss of openness and less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh this harm and no very special circumstances to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy N1 h)Policy N8 a)Policy N9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 205Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stafford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed7 September 20266010165
    The Ferns, 6 Broc Hill Way, Brocton, ST17 0UB
  2. Allowed13 July 20266007153
    Land at Willow Farm, Sandon Road, Sharpley Heath, ST15 8SL
  3. Allowed15 June 20266007019
    Land Adjacent to Higher Gorsty Birch Farm, Stallington Road, Blythe Bridge, ST11 9QH
  4. Dismissed20 April 20266005927
    5 Groundslow Mews, Winghouse Lane, Tittensor, Staffordshire, ST12 9HL
  5. Dismissed17 February 20266001103
    Land South East of Chase Lane, Tittensor, Stoke on Trent, ST12 9HH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.