Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 October 20233319730

95 Cudham Lane North , Orpington , Kent, BR6 6BY

a part two storey and single storey rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wilson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and whether this would amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would further harm its openness, and the family's need for additional space could not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy 49, Policy 51

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.