Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20243320210

Pavement Opposite 1 Gervis Place, Bournemouth, Bournemouth, BH1 2AL

the replacement of an existing advertised call box with a communication hub unit with defibrillator

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Underwood G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect the development would have on the character and appearance of the area, including the significance of designated heritage assets
  • The effect on the safety, convenience and enjoyment of pedestrians using the footway in which the development would be situated

What decided it

The proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the area and the significance of designated heritage assets, with limited public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm, and would also adversely affect pedestrian convenience and enjoyment contrary to the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy 5.11, Core Strategy Policy CS18, Core Strategy Policy CS41, Area Action Plan Policy D7, Area Action Plan Policy T1, Area Action Plan Policy T2, Public Realm Strategy SPD Guiding Principle B, Public Realm Strategy SPD Guiding Principle G

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.