Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 October 20233320241

Frith House, Far Oakridge, STROUD, GL6 7PG

conversion of existing barn to provide two staff accommodation units and land maintenance store

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Buchanan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the staff accommodation units would be annexes to Frith House or independent dwellinghouses, and be justified in location, use, form, size, siting, living conditions and accessibility.

What decided it

The Inspector's finding, secured by an occupancy condition, that the units would function as ancillary annexes closely related to and dependent on Frith House rather than as independent dwellinghouses.

The proposal accords with the development plan taken as a whole and there are no other material considerations, including provisions of the Framework, which override this finding, so the balance favoured allowing the appeal.

Framework references: 80, 55, 105

Plan policies cited: Policy CP15, Policy HC7, Policy CP14(9), Policy CP14(14), Policy HC1(7), Policy CP2, Policy CP3

Judgments cited: Uttlesford DC v Secretary of State for the Environment and White [1992]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.