Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 April 20243320447

Oaklands, Gloucester Road, Staverton, CHELTENHAM, Gloucestershire, GL51 0TF

provision of an agricultural building with a reduced area of hardstanding and re-surfaced access track (including part retention of works) and removal of 2 small brick buildings, removal of all external lighting and CCTV equipment and removal of 2.2 metre close boarded fencing that encloses the existing yard to be replaced with new 1.2m high post and rail fencing

Authority
Tewkesbury Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Householder developments
Inspector
Ford K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the agricultural building and boundary treatments are inappropriate development for the purposes of the development plan policy and the NPPF
  • The effect of the agricultural building and boundary treatments on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area as a result of the boundary treatments fronting onto the B4063 and around the residential property, Oaklands
  • If the agricultural building or boundary treatments are inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt which by definition is harmful, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh the totality of the harm caused, so very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 142, 152, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy GRB4, Policy SD5, Policy AGR1, Policy LAN2, Policy RES10, Policy SD4, Policy SD6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.