Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 October 20233320611

Paddock Adjacent to No.58 George Lane, Notton , Wakefield, WF4 2NJ

Planning appeal 3320611 at Paddock Adjacent to No.58 George Lane, Notton , Wakefield, WF4 2NJ (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 17 October 2023 by Inspector Wilkinson F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

the erection of 10 new build residential units, with all matters reserved apart from access

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wilkinson F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and Green Belt purposes, which would not be clearly outweighed by the housing and affordable housing benefits to amount to very special circumstances.

The substantial adverse weight attributed to inappropriateness in the Green Belt and conflict with Green Belt purposes was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and affordable housing provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS3Policy D1Policy CS10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 9
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  2. Dismissed10 August 20266004277
    Land At Back Lane, Woolley, Wakefield, WF4 2JT
  3. Allowed2 July 20263368025
    Land South of Wakefield B Substation, And East of Neil Fox Way, Wakefield, WF1 5DB
  4. Dismissed30 June 20266005423
    Land off Lee Moor Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4EU
  5. Allowed22 May 20266003228
    The Smithy, Whitley Farm Drive, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 4LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.