Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 November 20233320634

Glenroy School Bank, Norley, FRODSHAM, WA6 8JY

two storey side extension

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moulton E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development is inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Lynton, with particular regard to light and outlook

What decided it

The proposed extension qualifies as limited infilling in an identified village under paragraph 149(e) of the Framework and is therefore not inappropriate development in the Green Belt, removing the need to demonstrate very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy STRAT9, Policy DM21, Policy SOC5, Policy DM2, Policy R1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.