Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 January 20243320730

55 Mornington Road, Leytonstone, London, E11 3BG

the subdivision of site and construction of one two storey dwellinghouse with basement (1x2-bed) (use class C3). Ancillary hard and soft landscaping, bicycle parking and refuse/recycling storage facilities

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilson D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon housing mix in the area with particular regard to the provision of family sized dwellings
  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • whether adequate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers with particular regard to external space standards, privacy, daylight and sunlight
  • the effect of the development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to existing garden space and privacy
  • the effect of the development upon highway safety with particular regard to parking
  • whether the proposal promotes inclusive design

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupiers due to overshadowing and substandard external space, and unmitigated highway safety concerns regarding parking outweighed the benefits of housing supply and inclusive design.

Framework references: 123

Plan policies cited: Policy DM4, Policy DM5, Policy CS2, Policy CS15, Policy DM29, Policy DM7, Policy DM32, Policy D6, Policy CS7, Policy DM16, Policy D7, Policy DM30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.