Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld16 December 20253320982

17 Ennerdale Road, BEXLEYHEATH, DA7 5DP

Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Boffin D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the installation of closed circuit television cameras constitutes a breach of planning control
  • Whether the installation benefits from permitted development rights under Class F of the GPDO
  • Whether enforcement action was taken within the relevant time limit under section 171B of the 1990 Act
  • Whether the enforcement notice is invalid or defective
  • Whether the requirement to remove the cameras exceeds what is necessary to remedy the breach

What decided it

The CCTV cameras did not benefit from permitted development rights under Class F of the GPDO because the spacing between cameras was less than 10 metres, and the appellants failed to demonstrate that the installation was substantially completed before the four-year enforcement time limit.

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV39 (Built Environment), Policy H9 (Extensions and Alterations), Policy CS01 (Achieving Sustainable Development), Policy DP11 (Achieving high quality design), Policy SP5 (Placemaking Through Good Design), Policy SP1 (Achieving Sustainable Development)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.