Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld8 April 20253321618

Unit 1A Plaza Parade, Ealing Road , Wembley, HA0 4YA

Planning appeal 3321618 at Unit 1A Plaza Parade, Ealing Road , Wembley, HA0 4YA (London Borough of Brent) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 8 April 2025 by Inspector Hartley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

without planning permission, the material change of use of the pavement/front courtyard/former raised landscaped area outside of 1A Plaza Parade to a sales display/storage area used for retail purposes and, without planning permission, the installation of a new shop front with retractable canopies/awnings and orange/red metal bar to front boundary wall's inner side of tree/flower bed

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley D
Postcode
HA0 4YA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The safe and convenient movement of all people

What decided it

The material harm caused to the character and appearance of the area through the dominant and discordant canopies/awnings and the prevention of safe and convenient access for all users, particularly those with mobility needs, outweighed any other material planning considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BE7Supplementary Planning Document No 3 (Shop Fronts) 2018
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

533 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  3. Notice upheld24 September 20263365164
    Land and Garage, Rear of 21 Ivy Road and Adjacent to 31 Cedar Road, London, NW2 6SN
  4. Split Decision17 September 20263357462
    61 Alder Grove, London, NW2 7DE
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.