Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20233321673

176 Douglas Road, SURBITON, KT6 7SE

the erection of a single storey rear extension to enlarge the existing house and a 2 storey side extension to provide an additional dwelling following demolition of existing extensions

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Greenwood L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area
  • The safety of highway users
  • Sustainability, in terms of cycle parking or storage
  • The living conditions of the future occupiers of the new house, in terms of internal living space

What decided it

The adverse impacts on highway safety, arising from the cramped shared drive arrangement creating dangerous reversing movements and inadequate manoeuvring space, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply.

The benefits of boosting local housing supply and making efficient use of a sustainably located site weighed significantly in favour, but the compelling highway safety concerns outweighed these benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole under the tilted balance.

Framework references: 11, 110, 111

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of The London Plan, Policy CS8 of the Council's Core Strategy, Policy T6 of The London Plan, Policy T4 of The London Plan, Policy DM9 of the Council's Core Strategy, Policy DM10 of the Council's Core Strategy, Policy T5 of The London Plan, Policy DM8 of the Council's Core Strategy, Policy D6 of The London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.