Oakleigh and Tixley, West End, Woking, Surrey, GU24 9QP

Planning appeal 3321866 at Oakleigh and Tixley, West End, Woking, Surrey, GU24 9QP (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 January 2024 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies.

the erection of part one, part two storey rear extensions

Authority: Surrey Heath Borough Council
Appeal type: householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Phillips B
Postcode: GU24 9QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposed extensions would be disproportionate additions to buildings that have already been substantially extended, causing inappropriate development in the Green Belt and harm to openness, with no very special circumstances to justify this harm.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

88 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed18 September 20266012106
2 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
Allowed21 May 20266002295
Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
Dismissed1 May 20263376162
Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
Allowed17 April 20263374712
Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
Dismissed30 March 20263374826
Land to the West of 35 Mincing Lane, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8RS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.