Planning appeal decision
Land at Irwelll Vale, Helmshore, Rossendale, Lancashire, BL0 0QP
Planning appeal 3321887 at Land at Irwelll Vale, Helmshore, Rossendale, Lancashire, BL0 0QP (Rossendale Borough Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 4 June 2025 by Inspector Hitchcock R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Change of use, conversion and extension of former water tower to form a dwelling
- Authority
- Rossendale Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Hitchcock R
- Postcode
- BL0 0QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to privacy
- If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances to justify granting planning permission for the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes, and the benefits presented do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances.
The substantial harm from Green Belt inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with highway safety concerns and minor character harm, outweighed the benefits of housing contribution, building preservation and carbon savings, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD2Policy HS12Policy ENV1Policy ENV3Policy ENV6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- RB of Kingston upon Thames v SSLUHC [2023] EWHC 2055 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rossendale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed11 August 20266007826Slackhead Farm, Roundhill Lane, Rossendale, BB4 5TY
- Allowed31 March 20266002989Slackhead Farm, Roundhill Lane, Haslingden, BB4 5TY
- Allowed31 March 20266002987Land at Slack Head Farm, Roundhill Lane, Haslingden, BB4 5TY
- Dismissed18 August 2025336349312 Milne Street, Irewell Vale Ramsbottom, Bury, Lancashire, BL0 0QP
- Notice varied and upheld9 June 20253327155Land at Hall Fold, Hall Street, Whitworth, OL12 8XL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®