Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Seacox Cockers, The Mount, Flimwell, Ticehurst, East Sussex, TN5 7QP
Planning appeal 3321909 at Land Adjacent to Seacox Cockers, The Mount, Flimwell, Ticehurst, East Sussex, TN5 7QP (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 26 April 2024 by Inspector Wyborn D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the development plan would support the proposed housing in this location.
the erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellings, together with parking, new access, garden land and landscaping (alternative scheme to RR/2021/2521)
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wyborn D
- Postcode
- TN5 7QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the development plan would support the proposed housing in this location
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including having regard to its location within the High Weald National Landscape
- the effect of the development on the setting and heritage significance of the Grade II Listed Building, Seacox Cockers and Seacox Cottage
- whether or not future occupants of the dwellings would have satisfactory access to services and facilities by a range of transport modes
- whether or not the development would provide a safe and suitable vehicular access to the site, with particular regard to the provision of the visibility splay to the east
What decided it
The combination of unacceptable harm to the High Weald National Landscape, harm to the setting of the Grade II Listed Building, and failure to demonstrate safe and suitable highway access, which together constitute very substantial planning harms that are not outweighed by the moderate benefits of the scheme and conflict with the development plan as a whole.
The moderate benefits of the scheme (housing delivery, economic benefits, biodiversity net gain and reasonable access to services) were outweighed by the very substantial combined harms of conflict with the spatial strategy, substantial harm to the character and appearance of the High Weald National Landscape, less than substantial but meaningful harm to the setting and significance of the Grade II Listed Building, and unacceptable highway safety impacts.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy OSS1Policy OSS2Policy OSS3Policy OSS4Policy H1Policy RA2Policy RA3Policy EN1Policy EN2Policy EN3Policy PC1Policy SRM1Policy TR3Policy TR4Policy CO6Policy DEN1Policy DEN2Policy DHG12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 October 2026601553265 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed12 October 20266010105Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266008634Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
- Allowed21 September 20266009677Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®