Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 February 20243322196

The Elms And Land Adjacent Mottingham Lane, Mottingham, London, Bromley, SE9 4RT

the erection of a replacement dwelling associated with hard and soft landscaping with refuse and cycle

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development on MOL
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of MOL
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, the setting of the Fairmount Grade II listed building, and on Norlesden House as a non-designated heritage asset
  • the effect of the proposal on protected trees
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness and designation of Metropolitan Open Land, combined with harm to heritage assets and protected trees, is not clearly outweighed by the modest contribution to housing supply, so very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.

The substantial harm to the MOL by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with harm to heritage assets and protected trees, is not clearly outweighed by moderate weight given to housing supply contribution and limited weight given to green infrastructure and site stewardship, so the appeal is dismissed.

Framework references: 11, 154, 208, 209

Plan policies cited: Policy 49 BLP, Policy 50 BLP, Policy G3 LP, Policy 4 BLP, Policy 8 BLP, Policy 37 BLP, Policy 38 BLP, Policy 39 BLP, Policy 73 BLP, Policy 43 BLP

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.