Planning appeal decision
The Elms And Land Adjacent Mottingham Lane, Mottingham, London, Bromley, SE9 4RT
Planning appeal 3322196 at The Elms And Land Adjacent Mottingham Lane, Mottingham, London, Bromley, SE9 4RT (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 9 February 2024 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development on MOL.
the erection of a replacement dwelling associated with hard and soft landscaping with refuse and cycle
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright A
- Postcode
- SE9 4RT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development on MOL
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of MOL
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, the setting of the Fairmount Grade II listed building, and on Norlesden House as a non-designated heritage asset
- the effect of the proposal on protected trees
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness and designation of Metropolitan Open Land, combined with harm to heritage assets and protected trees, is not clearly outweighed by the modest contribution to housing supply, so very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.
The substantial harm to the MOL by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with harm to heritage assets and protected trees, is not clearly outweighed by moderate weight given to housing supply contribution and limited weight given to green infrastructure and site stewardship, so the appeal is dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 49 BLPPolicy 50 BLPPolicy G3 LPPolicy 4 BLPPolicy 8 BLPPolicy 37 BLPPolicy 38 BLPPolicy 39 BLPPolicy 73 BLPPolicy 43 BLP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 154Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Bromley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Split Decision5 August 20263378375Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
- Dismissed30 April 20266005662336 Main Road, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, TN16 2HL
- Allowed17 April 20266000833Land Between 127 & 129 Leaves Green Road, Keston, BR2 6DG
- Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263343405Land to the Rear of 50 to 54 Cudham Lane, Cudham, TN14 7QY
- Dismissed18 March 20263375346Downe Court, Cudham Road, Downe, Orpington, Bromley, BR6 7LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®