Planning appeal decision
Land Between 2 And 4 Horseshoe Lane, , Totteridge, Barnet, London , N20 8NJ
Planning appeal 3322380 at Land Between 2 And 4 Horseshoe Lane, , Totteridge, Barnet, London , N20 8NJ (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 20 February 2024 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of single dwellinghouse
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harrison F
- Postcode
- N20 8NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and the purposes of including the land within it
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees, bearing in mind it would be within the Totteridge Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
- whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the moderate reduction in spatial openness, combined with less than substantial harm to the significance of the Totteridge Conservation Area, are not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of providing one additional dwelling, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
the moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits from construction do not clearly outweigh the substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm by inappropriateness and loss of openness, and the great weight attached to less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset of the Totteridge Conservation Area
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2Policy DM15Policy CSNPPFPolicy CS1Policy CS5Policy CS7Policy DM01Policy DM06Policy DM16Policy G7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 186
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; Dartford Borough Council v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 141; Turner v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Barnet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed20 May 20263354231The Spinney, 22 Hendon Wood Lane, London, NW7 4HR
- Dismissed29 April 20266003015Powerleague Barnet, Bobby Moore Way, Muswell Hill, Barnet, N10 1ST
- Allowed28 April 20266001871West End House Cottage,, 58 Totteridge Common,, London,, N20 8LZ
- Dismissed10 April 20266000763Colebrook Court, Kitts End Road, Barnet, EN5 4QG
- Notice varied and upheld16 December 20253349499137 Marsh Lane, London, NW7 4EY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®