Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 February 20243322397

"Wayside" , Fullers Lane, Romford, RM5 3JT

Planning appeal 3322397 at "Wayside" , Fullers Lane, Romford, RM5 3JT (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 8 February 2024 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development to the rear of the site on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of bungalow and erection of pair of semi- detached houses and two detached bungalows

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
James A
Postcode
RM5 3JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development to the rear of the site on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety (Appeal A only)

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance caused by backland development that conflicts with the prevailing development pattern and spacious layout of the area, combined in Appeal A with highway safety harm, outweighs the modest housing supply benefits under the tilted balance.

The modest housing benefits (3 dwellings in Appeal A, 2 in Appeal B) and alignment with Framework objectives regarding housing supply and energy efficiency carried moderate weight, but were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and (in Appeal A) highway safety when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7Policy 26Policy 10Policy 23Policy 24
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

218 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.