Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 September 20233322423

18 Cresswell Drive, Cottesmore, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 7DY

two storey side extension (with the first-floor element to be flush with the house)

Authority
Rutland County Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Gee R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed extension would fail to be subservient to the original dwelling and would create a harmful terracing effect by significantly reducing the visual gap between neighbouring properties, contrary to development plan policies and supplementary planning guidance on extensions to dwellings.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS19 of the Rutland Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2011, Policy SP15 of the Rutland Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies Development Plan Document 2014, Policy COT H5 of the Cottesmore Neighbourhood Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.