Planning appeal decision
The Grange, 30 Windsor Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5DH
Planning appeal 3322464 at The Grange, 30 Windsor Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5DH (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 3 May 2024 by Inspector Guest H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
the erection of a two-storey, 3-bed wheelchair accessible bungalow, namely, a chalet bungalow with a pitched roof design, a single dormer to t he side elevation and two dormers to the rear
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Guest H
- Postcode
- TW19 5DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character of the street scene, including protected trees
- whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposal, with particular regard to local and national policy on flood risk
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No.32 Windsor Road, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity, with particular regard to protected species
- whether the proposal would meet sustainability and carbon reduction requirements
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions through loss of privacy, flood risk acceptability, and biodiversity, in the absence of sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with development plan policies, outweighed the benefits of providing wheelchair accessible accommodation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy NR1Policy NR2Policy SP2Policy HOU1Policy HOU2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 September 202660083374 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
- Allowed9 April 202533564638 Bell Weir Close, Wraysbury , Staines , TW19 6HF
- Dismissed13 September 20243337325Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®