Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 September 20243337325

Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA

Planning appeal 3337325 at Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 13 September 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to a non-designated heritage asset.

the development of new apartment building comprising 6 no. 2 bedroom units with associated parking, landscaping, cycle and refuse store

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
SL5 8AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to a non-designated heritage asset
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of Edenbrook Place, with regard to outlook and privacy
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with regard to provision of external amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on trees

What decided it

The significant adverse harm to the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the non-designated heritage asset Edenbrook Place, could not be justified and outweighed the benefits of the proposal even under the tilted balance.

The significant adverse impacts on character and appearance, including harm to the setting of a non-designated heritage asset, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of delivering six housing units on previously developed land, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE1Policy QP3Policy DG1Policy DG2Policy DG3Policy SP2Policy NR3Policy NP-DG2Policy NP-EN2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

74 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed23 September 20266008337
    4 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
  2. Allowed9 April 20253356463
    8 Bell Weir Close, Wraysbury , Staines , TW19 6HF
  3. Dismissed3 May 20243322464
    The Grange, 30 Windsor Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5DH
  4. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  5. Allowed26 October 20266014376
    Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.