Planning appeal decision
Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA
Planning appeal 3337325 at Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 13 September 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to a non-designated heritage asset.
the development of new apartment building comprising 6 no. 2 bedroom units with associated parking, landscaping, cycle and refuse store
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rafferty C
- Postcode
- SL5 8AA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to a non-designated heritage asset
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of Edenbrook Place, with regard to outlook and privacy
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with regard to provision of external amenity space
- The effect of the proposal on trees
What decided it
The significant adverse harm to the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the non-designated heritage asset Edenbrook Place, could not be justified and outweighed the benefits of the proposal even under the tilted balance.
The significant adverse impacts on character and appearance, including harm to the setting of a non-designated heritage asset, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of delivering six housing units on previously developed land, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HE1Policy QP3Policy DG1Policy DG2Policy DG3Policy SP2Policy NR3Policy NP-DG2Policy NP-EN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 September 202660083374 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
- Allowed9 April 202533564638 Bell Weir Close, Wraysbury , Staines , TW19 6HF
- Dismissed3 May 20243322464The Grange, 30 Windsor Road, Wraysbury, Staines-Upon-Thames, TW19 5DH
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Allowed26 October 20266014376Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®