Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 September 20243337325

Former Heatherwood Hospital, London Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 8AA

the development of new apartment building comprising 6 no. 2 bedroom units with associated parking, landscaping, cycle and refuse store

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to a non-designated heritage asset
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of Edenbrook Place, with regard to outlook and privacy
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with regard to provision of external amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on trees

What decided it

The significant adverse harm to the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the non-designated heritage asset Edenbrook Place, could not be justified and outweighed the benefits of the proposal even under the tilted balance.

The significant adverse impacts on character and appearance, including harm to the setting of a non-designated heritage asset, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of delivering six housing units on previously developed land, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy HE1, Policy QP3, Policy DG1, Policy DG2, Policy DG3, Policy SP2, Policy NR3, Policy NP-DG2, Policy NP-EN2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.