Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 November 20233322483

23 Osprey Drive, Hertfordshire, ST. ALBANS, AL4 0LT

described on the appeal form as a “Part single, part two storey rear extension (resubmission following approval of 5/2021/3166 dated 07/01/22)

Authority
St Albans City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fallon R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The extension would not be a disproportionate addition to the original building as it steps down from the main roof ridgeline and has a subordinate character, therefore falling within paragraph 149 of the Framework and not constituting inappropriate Green Belt development.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13, Policy 69, Policy 72

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.