Planning appeal decision
23 Osprey Drive, Hertfordshire, ST. ALBANS, AL4 0LT
described on the appeal form as a “Part single, part two storey rear extension (resubmission following approval of 5/2021/3166 dated 07/01/22)
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Fallon R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The extension would not be a disproportionate addition to the original building as it steps down from the main roof ridgeline and has a subordinate character, therefore falling within paragraph 149 of the Framework and not constituting inappropriate Green Belt development.
Framework references: 149
Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13, Policy 69, Policy 72
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®