Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 February 20243322700

The Stables, Little Common Lane, Bletchingley, REDHILL, RH1 4QF

demolition of existing stable buildings and the erection of a bungalow

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The quality of living conditions for future occupiers
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal's greater impact on Green Belt openness and harm to character and appearance, combined with the absence of very special circumstances, outweigh the modest housing benefits and engage the Green Belt exception in footnote 7 of the Framework, displacing the tilted balance.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the modest social and economic benefits of a single new dwelling, and very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 11, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy CSP18, Policy DP7, Policy DP8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.