Planning appeal decision
The Stables, Little Common Lane, Bletchingley, Redhill, RH1 4QF
Planning appeal 3322700 at The Stables, Little Common Lane, Bletchingley, Redhill, RH1 4QF (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 8 February 2024 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
demolition of existing stable buildings and the erection of a bungalow
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Miles H
- Postcode
- RH1 4QF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The quality of living conditions for future occupiers
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal's greater impact on Green Belt openness and harm to character and appearance, combined with the absence of very special circumstances, outweigh the modest housing benefits and engage the Green Belt exception in footnote 7 of the Framework, displacing the tilted balance.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the modest social and economic benefits of a single new dwelling, and very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy CSP18Policy DP7Policy DP8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®