Planning appeal decision
Area of Grass Verge, Land Opposite 105a New Farthingdale, Dormansland, Tandridge, Surrey, RH7 6RF
Planning appeal 3322976 at Area of Grass Verge, Land Opposite 105a New Farthingdale, Dormansland, Tandridge, Surrey, RH7 6RF (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 23 May 2024 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the siting and appearance of the 5G street pole would harmfully affect the character and appearance of the area, and if so, whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account suitable alternatives.
a 5G telecoms installation: H3G 15m phase 9 street pole and additional equipment cabinets
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Pearce J
- Postcode
- RH7 6RF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the siting and appearance of the 5G street pole would harmfully affect the character and appearance of the area, and if so, whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account suitable alternatives
What decided it
The appellant did not adequately demonstrate that there were no suitable alternatives or that the appeal site was the best available option for minimising the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18Policy DP6Policy DP7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 118Paragraph 121
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®