Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision10 January 20243323020

Dental Surgery, 28 Rosewood Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 5LH

Planning appeal 3323020 at Dental Surgery, 28 Rosewood Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 5LH (London Borough of Havering) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 10 January 2024 by Inspector Bartlett R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.

a new conservatory to the back of the existing building to provide space for the patients and staff. Reducing the kerb to accommodate a new driveway and relocating 3 car parking spaces to the front of the building

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Bartlett R
Postcode
RM12 5LH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupiers of adjoining residential properties
  • the effect of the re-located car parking, access and driveway on highway safety

What decided it

The new parking and access arrangements to the front of the site would be detrimental to pedestrian and highway safety due to limited visibility, restricted turning space, and the proximity of the new side extension to the footpath, contrary to paragraph 115 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 26Policy 7Policy 24Policy T6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 191

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

170 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.